Jan Ullrich pays up to end fraud case
Disgraced former Tour de France winner Jan Ullrich has paid a “six figure” fine to end a fraud case which has dogged him since July 2006, the public prosecutor in Bonn said Monday.
Prosecutors had accused the 1997 Tour de France winner of taking performance-enhancing drugs, leading under German law to fraud charges against the 34-year-old on the basis he deceived the public, sponsors and his team.
“The Bonn prosecutor has, with the agreement of the seventh Bonn chamber of appeal, decided to lay aside procedures in the case of suspected fraud targeting Jan Ullrich,” the prosecutor’s office said, adding the fine was “in six figures” without elaborating further.
On his website Ullrich said he was happy with the outcome. “The payment of this fine is not a recognition of guilt … it allows (me) to free my family from the pressure surrounding this procedure,” he said.
“I never cheated anyone in my whole career nor did I prejudice anyone. I was always a loyal sportsman, my victories were the result of hard work and passion for my sport,” he insisted.
Ullrich has insisted he did not take banned substances but has paid up a sum reported to be anything between 100,000 and one million euros, a sum reported Saturday by Focus news magazine on its website.
Under German law, Ullrich, who retired early last year, had the option to settle the matter out of court if he paid up and duly did so. German law does not recognise doping as such, hence the charge of fraud.
Despite the denials by the former leader of the T-Mobile team in April last year German officials indicated that DNA tests had suggested blood samples uncovered in the wake of the Puerto investigation in Spain were from the racer. As a result of that investigation T-Mobile sacked Ullrich and he retired in February last year.
The 32-year-old still faces further investigation in Germany and Switzerland in connection with the Spanish affair.
© AFP 2008
Jan Ullrich (AFP/Getty Images)
Popularity: 5% [?]
Related Articles
- Deals With The Devil
- Mellow Johnny’s - Lance Armstrong’s Bike Shop
- TRANSITION, BASE WORK AND PREPARATION FOR YOUR MOST SUCCESSFUL CYCLING YEAR EVER!
April 16th, 2008 at 9:29 am
Explain how paying a fine to stop a fraud trial is different from bribing an official. Except for the fact that paying the fine is public, it looks the same to me. It also seems wrong that he can pay a fine and still say that it “is not a recognition of guilt”. For that kind of coin, couldn’t he have mounted a decent defense?